Comparison
Where Rhea fits in your data stack.
Storage, key management, encryption and secure exchange solve important parts of the problem. RED combines supported data workflows in one environment. Compare the actual deployment, trust boundary and available capabilities, not just the category name.
Market context
More software. More actors. Who controls the data?
Organizations are using more cloud services and bringing AI into their work. Each system creates another relationship with organizational data: what it may access, what it may change and under whose authority.
Rhea's thesis is that this authority should become reusable infrastructure—so organizations can add supported applications, agents and providers without rebuilding the entire operating and authorization model for each workflow.
52.7%
Paid cloud use
In 2025, 52.7% of EU enterprises in Eurostat's survey used paid cloud services.
Eurostat — cloud services, published 3 February 202620.0%
AI in business
In 2025, 20.0% of EU enterprises in Eurostat's survey used AI technologies in their business.
Eurostat — AI use, published 11 December 2025Identity. Authorization. Interoperability.
An infrastructure concern
NIST's AI Agent Standards Initiative addresses interoperable agents, open protocols, security and agent identity infrastructure.
NIST — AI Agent Standards InitiativeThe Eurostat figures cover EU enterprises with at least 10 employees or self-employed persons in the surveyed business sectors. They are not worldwide adoption figures or estimates of Rhea's market. AI use does not necessarily mean autonomous-agent use. NIST's initiative is context, not endorsement or certification of Rhea.
Identity, policy, encryption and data operations are established capabilities. Rhea's direction brings them into one customer-authority architecture: people work through RED, approved software uses supported operations, and customer-controlled connectors independently verify execution authority.
Rhea's architectural distinction: the complete customer-authority model.
Rhea is building a shared operating layer in which useful data operations and customer-owned authority travel together. People use RED. Planned developer interfaces extend supported operations to separately authorized applications, AI agents and workloads. Customer-controlled connectors independently verify authority where those operations execute.
Customer-owned authority
The organization controls the cryptographic authority that permits an operation. The target is not a service that can manufacture sufficient customer authority by itself.
Independent customer-side enforcement
A customer-controlled connector verifies the signed action, resource, constraints, expiry and policy before execution, with customer-side replay protection.
Useful operations across supported systems
The model joins authorization to actual data work—such as reading, writing and moving supported resources—through provider-specific adapters.
Separate authority for people and software
People, applications, AI agents and workloads receive distinct, bounded authority. A new actor does not inherit universal access to connected data.
Protection and execution evidence
Protected data, authorization and signed execution reports are linked within the operating model. Evidence must distinguish what was authorized, what the executor observed and what result was confirmed.
Survivability when the vendor is compromised
The defining target is that compromising Rhea must not enable an attacker to manufacture customer authority. This includes enrollment, recovery and executable-update boundaries—not request signatures alone.
These describe the customer-controlled architecture under development, not a completed guarantee for every current RED connection. Current provider paths, credential handling, available workflows and planned interfaces are documented in Architecture and Product Status.
What this could make possible.
Illustrative planned workflow
A research agent is authorized to create reports in one approved storage location. An analysis agent may read those completed reports and write results to another location. People review the permitted results through RED.
Each participant has separate authority. Each operation is limited to its approved resources and purpose. The customer-controlled execution environment checks the request, and execution evidence records what happened.
The research, reasoning and scheduling can remain in the organization's existing software. Rhea's role is the supported data-operation and authority layer—not a requirement to replace every application with RED.
Rhea is not trying to replace the entire technology stack. It is building a reusable authority and operations layer across supported parts of that stack. Its intended advantage is the combination: useful workflows, customer-owned authority, independent enforcement and verifiable execution.
Market context draws on Eurostat and NIST publications. Sources reviewed 6 September 2026. Rhea's architectural direction is presented separately from current product availability; implementation and security boundaries are documented in Architecture and Product Status.
Capability matrix
Capabilities depend on the product and deployment.
Content protected before the storage provider receives it
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Not by server-side encryption alone
- Provider key management
- Possible with client-side integration
- File encryption tools
- Core function
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Product-dependent
- RED
- Client-side file encryption
Readable-data authority separate from infrastructure administration
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Configuration-dependent
- Provider key management
- External-key options exist
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Deployment-dependent
- RED
- Document keys separate from storage access
Organizational authorization model for named members
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Provider IAM
- Provider key management
- Key policies / provider IAM
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Available in many products
- RED
- Roles, permissions and approvals
Revocation of an individual participant's access
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Provider access controls
- Provider key management
- Key and policy controls
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Product-dependent
- RED
- Future access through RED, within documented limits
Controlled inbound collection instead of email attachments
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Requires a configured workflow
- Provider key management
- Not a collection workflow alone
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Common capability
- RED
- Secure File Requests
Recorded evidence of access, approval and administration
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Provider logging
- Provider key management
- Key-operation logging
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Service logging
- RED
- Recorded activity; scope varies by event type
Data stays in storage the customer owns
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Customer account options
- Provider key management
- Depends on storage integration
- File encryption tools
- Depends on destination
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Customer-storage options exist
- RED
- Supported customer-owned storage
One protection model across multiple connected storage locations
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Configuration-dependent
- Provider key management
- Service and configuration-dependent
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Product-dependent
- RED
- Connected AWS S3 locations
Governed movement between connected storage locations
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Native or integrated workflows
- Provider key management
- Requires an operational workflow
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Available in some products
- RED
- S3 copy and location update; source retained
Protected structured data in a database
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Service-dependent
- Provider key management
- Via supported database integration
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Outside typical file-exchange scope
- RED
- Planned
Application and AI-agent authority
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Provider and workload controls
- Provider key management
- Service/workload authorization
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Product-dependent
- RED
- Planned unified actor model
Public API, SDK or integration programme
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Provider-dependent
- Provider key management
- Service-dependent
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Product-dependent
- RED
- Planned public interfaces
Completed independent third-party security audit
- Cloud storage with provider-side encryption
- Provider-dependent
- Provider key management
- Provider-dependent
- File encryption tools
- Product-dependent
- Secure transfer and data rooms
- Product-dependent
- RED
- Not published yet
| Capability | Cloud storage with provider-side encryption | Provider key management | File encryption tools | Secure transfer and data rooms | RED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content protected before the storage provider receives it | Not by server-side encryption alone | Possible with client-side integration | Core function | Product-dependent | Client-side file encryption |
| Readable-data authority separate from infrastructure administration | Configuration-dependent | External-key options exist | Product-dependent | Deployment-dependent | Document keys separate from storage access |
| Organizational authorization model for named members | Provider IAM | Key policies / provider IAM | Product-dependent | Available in many products | Roles, permissions and approvals |
| Revocation of an individual participant's access | Provider access controls | Key and policy controls | Product-dependent | Product-dependent | Future access through RED, within documented limits |
| Controlled inbound collection instead of email attachments | Requires a configured workflow | Not a collection workflow alone | Product-dependent | Common capability | Secure File Requests |
| Recorded evidence of access, approval and administration | Provider logging | Key-operation logging | Product-dependent | Service logging | Recorded activity; scope varies by event type |
| Data stays in storage the customer owns | Customer account options | Depends on storage integration | Depends on destination | Customer-storage options exist | Supported customer-owned storage |
| One protection model across multiple connected storage locations | Configuration-dependent | Service and configuration-dependent | Product-dependent | Product-dependent | Connected AWS S3 locations |
| Governed movement between connected storage locations | Native or integrated workflows | Requires an operational workflow | Product-dependent | Available in some products | S3 copy and location update; source retained |
| Protected structured data in a database | Service-dependent | Via supported database integration | Product-dependent | Outside typical file-exchange scope | Planned |
| Application and AI-agent authority | Provider and workload controls | Service/workload authorization | Product-dependent | Product-dependent | Planned unified actor model |
| Public API, SDK or integration programme | Provider-dependent | Service-dependent | Product-dependent | Product-dependent | Planned public interfaces |
| Completed independent third-party security audit | Provider-dependent | Provider-dependent | Product-dependent | Product-dependent | Not published yet |
This is a category-level orientation, not a benchmark of every vendor. Products and configurations differ, and capabilities overlap. RED entries follow the published product scope. Revocation limits future access through the enforcing system; it does not erase plaintext or copies already obtained by an authorized recipient. This limitation also applies to RED.
Key management
Keys are one part of the operating model.
Key-management products control cryptographic keys and their use, including customer-controlled and external-key configurations. Rhea's direction combines authority with supported data operations, delegation and execution evidence across systems. It does not require dismissing or replacing the key-management tools a customer already uses.
File protection
Protection becomes useful through controlled work.
File protection is essential, and some products also offer access control, revocation and audit. RED brings protected documents, collection, sharing, movement and recorded activity into one operating environment. The broader architecture extends that model through customer-controlled execution and planned software interfaces.
Secure exchange
Useful workflows. Explicit trust boundaries.
Secure-transfer and data-room products support controlled exchange; some also connect customer-owned storage. Compare where keys and provider credentials sit, who enforces authority and which operations are supported. Rhea's intended distinction is the complete combination of useful workflows and independently enforced customer authority, not one feature in isolation.
Current fit
What to check before choosing RED.
- You need a machine-secrets manager that injects credentials into application runtimes.
- You need protected structured data in a database today — database connectivity is Planned.
- You need a completed third-party certification or audit report as a procurement gate today.
- You cannot operate your own storage account and want the vendor to hold the data.
See the operating model inside RED.
Explore supported document workflows, connected storage and recorded activity. Use the architecture and product-status pages to check the boundaries relevant to your organization.